Dallas Apartment Reviews Directory
Menu

The Chase Apartments

Updated 2026-07-23 · 973 reviewed · 147 listed · Scored from 285 Google reviews · How we rank ›

3.6(285) 61 composite score See reviews on Google ✓ Google-verified
Luxury High-Rise Living
The Chase Apartments
Service
Luxury High-Rise Living
Reviews
285

What recent reviews say

Staff excellence masks deeper building issues. Leasing team members like Gabriela earn consistent praise for professionalism and follow-through during move-in. However, residents struggle with broken gates that compromise security, months-long waits for AC repairs, and neighbors whose late-night noise and parties go unchecked. Ground maintenance falls short: trash piles, dog waste, and pest problems persist. Deposit returns take half a year or never arrive, and the office is often closed during business hours despite listed availability.

Quality of living depends heavily on your unit and neighbors. Some residents report swift maintenance and resolve issues within weeks. Others face sewage backups, wall leaks, and broken appliances without remedy. The complex feels inconsistently managed: a strong property manager cannot be everywhere, and staff who remain struggle to enforce rules or communicate transparently about timelines and rent deductions.

Praised for
  • attentive, responsive leasing staff (Gabriela, Gabby, and others)
  • quick maintenance response on many requests
  • spacious floor plans and good parking availability
  • safe area and gated community concept
Watch-outs
  • non-functional or unreliable gates and security access
  • long delays on critical repairs (AC, plumbing)
  • noisy neighbors and insufficient enforcement of quiet hours
  • poor ground maintenance (trash, debris, dog waste, cockroaches)
  • deposit refunds delayed or not issued; office closed during stated hours
responsive-managementpoor-maintenanceslow-repairsnoisy-neighborspest-issuesfriendly-staffclean-grounds
Best for: Residents prioritizing leasing support and spacious units who can tolerate noise and inconsistent building upkeep.
Think twice if: Non-functional security gates, months-long repair delays, and persistent noise and maintenance issues deter those seeking reliable enforced quiet or dependable critical repairs.

Strengths

  • Staff responsiveness during leasing and move-in
  • Quick response on many maintenance calls
  • Spacious layouts and reliable parking
  • Safe, gated community setting

Worth knowing

  • Leasing staff named Gabriela ('Gabby' or 'Gabbz'), Geraldyn, Dexy, and David praised for responsiveness
  • Maintenance team members José and Luis and manager Miguel cited for efficiency
  • Property manager Andrea also mentioned positively
  • AC repair delays documented as 4-5 months despite multiple requests
  • One resident waited nearly five months post-move-out for security deposit return
  • Gate failures repeatedly cited as security concern
  • Valet trash service inconsistently completed

What reviews say by service

Luxury High-Rise Living
Staff excellence during lease signing undermined by gate failures, delayed critical repairs, and insufficient tenant enforcement for luxury pricing.

How it compares

  • Rated 3.6 against a 4.02 average across the 116 luxury high-rise living businesses listed here.
  • Has more Google reviews than 71% of the businesses in this directory.

How we scored this

How We Rank
Star rating 9
Review volume 100
Review recency 100
Review sentiment 45
Profile completeness 100
Verification 30

Rating breakdown

5
170
4
10
3
5
2
11
1
89

Common questions

Is the complex truly gated and secure?
The complex is gated, but multiple residents report the gates frequently malfunction or remain broken, compromising the security benefit.
How long does maintenance take?
Responses vary widely. Some residents report same-day or next-day service; others describe critical repairs (AC, plumbing) taking 4-5 months despite multiple requests.
What happens to my security deposit when I move out?
One resident reported waiting nearly five months and still not receiving a returned deposit after move-out, despite multiple calls and visits to the office.

Similar apartment complexes nearby

The Vincent
56

The Vincent

3.5(632)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The Vincent presents a sharp divide between its architectural appeal and resident experience. Reviewers consistently praise the physical units-quartz countertops, stainless steel finishes, floor plans-and specific maintenance staff like Jonathan and Yonatan for rapid, professional repairs. However, this quality masks serious operational failures. The leasing office fails at basic communication: phone calls go unanswered for weeks, promised callbacks vanish, and application processing sits idle for days. This dysfunction extends to property management. Residents report A/C outages lasting months despite repeated requests, overflowing trash bins, unmaintained pools, and slow handling of move-in defects. A system outage forced staff to rely on pen and paper, compounding chaos. Understaffing is acknowledged but unresolved; two office employees cannot manage the workload. The result is a pattern of promises broken after deposits are taken. Multiple residents describe being told units were immediately available, then facing multi-week delays. Others describe paying thousands in hotel bills or tolls while disputes dragged on. One resident waited seven years for an A/C repair until a service manager (Mr. Greg) finally intervened. The regional manager reportedly processes refunds when complaints escalate, suggesting a symptom-treatment rather than systemic fix. The complex attracts residents wanting affordable luxury but delivers unreliability that costs renters money and peace of mind.

Luxury High-Rise Living
Gramercy on the Park
58

Gramercy on the Park

3.4(435)✓ Google-verified

Half of tenants report smooth check-ins thanks to staff like Nique and Adam; grounds and common areas earn consistent praise for cleanliness and sound control. The other half describe a stark contrast: units arriving broken (mold, rust, non-working appliances), leasing office contradictions that soured negotiations, pest and animal-confinement complaints left unresolved for weeks, and stairwell sanitation failures that required tenants to clean themselves. Rent expectations are not met by unit condition. Management acts fast on immediate problems (roach treatment, burst-pipe relocations) but structural issues languish. Safety lapses like stairwell filth and nightly fire alarms appear routine rather than rare. Package theft is common enough that repeat residents now refuse delivery. The split between move-in experience and ongoing unit quality defines this complex: staff charm cannot compensate for what tenants receive at key-hand.

Luxury High-Rise Living
Champions of North Dallas
54

Champions of North Dallas

3.4(531)✓ Google-verified

Living here feels like a gamble between a few dedicated staff and systemic neglect. New management (Asset Living) has tanked what was once a well-run property, leaving residents without AC in 95-degree heat for weeks, mold spreading unchecked, and roaches in beds while waiting for maintenance that never shows. The lease documents don't match what you pay, trash fees pile up even when it is not collected, and calling the office is futile. A small crew of leasing agents (Annessa, Cole, Frank, Judy) go above and beyond, but they cannot fix broken systems, uncommunicative leadership, or the fact that invoices arrive via money order and some buildings sit empty because residents fled. The property itself has good bones: affordable pricing, usable layouts, working pools and gyms. But since late 2025, it has become a maze of broken promises, emergency maintenance phone trees, and residents stuck between health risks and lease obligations. Those who praise it name only specific staff; those who condemn it describe years of decay under the current management team.

Luxury High-Rise Living

Own this business? Get featured

Own or market a business here? Ask about featured placement and advertising on this directory. Your message goes straight to the directory team.

Last updated 2026-07-23